‍

In today’s fast-paced, technology-driven world, organizations increasingly turn to IT suppliers for managed services and outsourcing. The rationale is simple: focus on what you do best—your core business—while leveraging the IT supplier’s expertise to handle the complexities of IT operations. This arrangement is intended to be a win-win. Organizations benefit from the supplier's skills, experience, and economies of scale, while IT suppliers can demonstrate their value by delivering consistent, high-quality services.

From Service Desk and Remote Support to Middleware and Network Support, IT suppliers take on the critical responsibility of ensuring smooth operations across IT environments. However, this relationship—built on trust and performance—is increasingly at risk due to a concerning trend: the rise of SLA (Service Level Agreement) manipulation.

Why Organizations Seek IT Suppliers

Outsourcing IT operations is a strategic decision. It allows organizations to tap into IT suppliers' deep expertise and infrastructure while freeing internal teams to focus on innovation and growth. This arrangement spans a variety of services:

  • Service Desk: First-level support for resolving end-user issues.
  • Remote and Desk-Side Support: On-site and remote solutions for technical problems.
  • Application Management Services: Managing and maintaining critical applications.
  • Infrastructure Support: Middleware, databases, servers, storage, and networks.

When IT suppliers deliver as promised, they enable businesses to improve efficiency, enhance customer satisfaction, and reduce operational risk. However, when suppliers fall short, the consequences ripple through the organization—delayed resolutions, increased costs, and dissatisfied customers.

The Unethical Trend: SLA Manipulation

In recent years, a troubling practice has emerged. Many IT suppliers, struggling with a lack of leadership and operational discipline, have resorted to unethical business practices to meet or falsely demonstrate compliance with contractual deliverables. SLA manipulation tactics have become a shortcut for covering up their inability to deliver promised results.

These tactics include:

  1. Redefining Metrics Post-Facto: Adjusting SLA definitions to show compliance retroactively.
  2. Selective Exclusions: Excluding incidents or delays from SLA calculations by labeling them as "out of scope."
  3. Reclassification of Incidents: Downgrading high-priority incidents to lower priorities to meet response-time metrics.
  4. Delaying Reporting: Withholding SLA reporting until discrepancies are "fixed."
  5. Overcomplicating the SLA Agreement: Creating convoluted SLA definitions that make tracking and accountability difficult for the customer.

Such practices not only damage the reputation of the supplier but also erode the trust and partnership that outsourcing arrangements are supposed to foster.

The Bigger Problem: Lack of Leadership and Operational Structures

The root cause of SLA manipulation often lies in poor leadership and inadequate operational structures within the IT supplier organization. Without a strong foundation of ethical practices, clear accountability, and robust processes, suppliers struggle to meet the demands of their contracts. Rather than addressing these shortcomings head-on, some suppliers resort to shortcuts to “appear” compliant.

This trend signals a deeper problem: the commoditization of IT services. Suppliers increasingly focus on cutting costs and winning contracts at the expense of delivering quality service. This approach might yield short-term gains, but it damages long-term relationships and tarnishes the credibility of the entire outsourcing industry.

The Path Forward

For IT suppliers to rebuild trust and credibility, they must prioritize ethical practices and operational excellence. This requires:

  1. Investing in Leadership Development: Strong leaders set the tone for ethical behavior and drive accountability.
  2. Building Robust Operational Frameworks: Clear processes and accountability structures prevent performance gaps.
  3. Transparent Communication with Clients: Regular, honest updates foster trust, even when challenges arise.
  4. Simplifying SLA Definitions: Clear and measurable SLAs leave no room for misinterpretation.
  5. Fostering a Partnership Mentality: Viewing clients as partners rather than revenue sources encourages long-term value creation.

Conclusion

IT outsourcing is a powerful enabler for organizations seeking to optimize operations and focus on their core missions. However, the value of this partnership hinges on trust, transparency, and performance. When suppliers resort to SLA manipulation, they undermine the very purpose of outsourcing—leaving organizations frustrated and disillusioned.

To break this cycle, IT suppliers must take responsibility for their shortcomings and invest in sustainable, ethical practices. Only then can they truly deliver the value they promise and build long-lasting partnerships that benefit everyone involved.

What are your thoughts on SLA manipulation in the IT industry? Have you experienced similar challenges? Share your perspective in the comments below.

‍