‍

In IT outsourcing, First Call Resolution (FCR) is a primary measure of service success. The higher the FCR, the fewer repeat calls and escalations—key indicators of customer satisfaction. However, the intense focus on meeting FCR targets often tempts vendors to manipulate metrics rather than improve service quality. Understanding these tactics and using operational analytics to detect manipulation can help businesses ensure true value from their outsourcing partnerships.

Why FCR Matters

FCR reflects a vendor’s ability to resolve issues at the first point of contact, reducing the need for repeat calls and increasing customer satisfaction. A genuine improvement in FCR often signifies efficient troubleshooting, skilled agents, and effective processes. But without skilled staff and clear processes, vendors may seek shortcuts, undermining the reliability of FCR as a quality measure.

Common Tactics Vendors Use to Manipulate FCR

  1. Redefining "Resolution": Vendors might loosely define "resolution" as any temporary fix, even if the underlying problem persists. This inflates FCR rates artificially without providing lasting solutions, allowing vendors to claim high resolution rates while delivering poor service quality.
  2. Cherry-Picking Simple Issues: To maximize FCR, vendors may prioritize resolving simple issues over complex ones. This selective approach boosts FCR figures but often delays resolutions for more critical issues, negatively impacting overall customer satisfaction and leaving complex problems unresolved.
  3. Callback Classification: Vendors may reset call records by classifying callbacks within a short timeframe as separate incidents. This creates the illusion of multiple first-contact resolutions rather than a continued issue, inflating FCR and hiding the recurring nature of complex problems.
  4. Avoiding or Deferring Escalations: Instead of escalating unresolved issues or providing comprehensive troubleshooting, vendors might close tickets after offering partial solutions, instructing clients to call back if the issue persists. Each new call is treated as a separate issue, artificially boosting FCR.
  5. Technical Ticket Splitting: Vendors may document follow-up calls as new tickets, especially if they involve different support tiers. By treating repeat calls on the same issue as fresh incidents, vendors achieve higher FCR on paper, masking inefficiencies in true problem resolution.
  6. Encouraging Self-Resolution: In some cases, agents might encourage customers to attempt solutions independently, counting the issue as resolved once the customer agrees to try the recommendation. This tactic, while effective in certain cases, is often misused to avoid in-depth troubleshooting.
  7. Influencing Customer Perception: Some agents subtly dissuade customers from calling back by suggesting a delayed solution. This can reduce repeat calls, increasing FCR without addressing the quality of service, as unresolved issues may persist unnoticed.

Operational Analytics: A Solution for Detecting Manipulation

Operational analytics can reveal manipulation patterns in FCR metrics. Advanced analytics methods—such as anomaly detection, call pattern analysis, and Voice of the Customer (VoC) correlation—can identify when FCR rates deviate from expected benchmarks. For example, VoC feedback and survey data can validate FCR figures, while comparing FCR rates across different types of issues can expose cherry-picking or ticket splitting. Additionally, AI-driven analytics can flag abnormal callback rates and segment FCR performance by issue type, ensuring FCR aligns with real issue resolution.

Conclusion: Protecting the Integrity of FCR Metrics

In outsourcing agreements, accurate FCR tracking is essential to achieving customer satisfaction and operational efficiency. However, without vigilance and robust analytics, these metrics can become easily manipulated, misleading businesses and impacting service quality. By using operational analytics, companies can detect manipulative practices, ensuring FCR reflects true service success and preserving the value of outsourcing partnerships.

For more insights into improving FCR accuracy and using analytics to safeguard service quality, explore additional articles and resources on Imad Lodhi’s website.

‍