‍

Have you ever hired a consulting firm or BPO and ended up with a team of inexperienced, unskilled resources? Are you tired of settling for second best and want to ensure you get the best resources for your team? In today's cost-driven market, it's easy for consulting firms and BPOs to prioritize cost over quality, resulting in the dreaded "Team B."
It's frustrating to pay top dollar for consulting services or BPOs only to end up with a team of inexperienced resources. You might feel like you've been duped or misled by the sales pitch, and the quality of work suffers as a result. Don't settle for Team B - you deserve better.
There are several steps organizations can take to ensure they don't end up with Team B. By prioritizing quality over cost and being proactive in selecting the consulting firms and BPOs, organizations can leverage high-performing teams that deliver excellent results.

‍

Summary:

In this topic, we will discuss the concept of "Team A" and "Team B" in the context of consulting firms and BPOs. Often during the sales and engagement cycle, these companies pitch the best and brightest resources (Team A) to potential clients, but end up staffing with less experienced and cheaper resources (Team B) due to cost pressures. This leads to a gap between what was promised and what is delivered, resulting in unsatisfied clients. In this discussion, we will explore how organizations can avoid this situation and ensure they deliver on their promises.

‍

Introduction:

In the world of consulting firms and BPOs, the sales and engagement cycle plays a crucial role in winning and retaining clients. Service Providers spend a considerable amount of time and effort pitching their services and resources to potential clients, promising the best and brightest talent to meet their needs. However, once the contract is signed, the reality is often different from what was promised. Clients may find that they are staffed with less experienced and cheaper resources, which can lead to lower quality work and ultimately, unsatisfied clients.

‍

This situation arises due to cost pressures faced by the consulting and BPO firms. In an effort to keep costs low, they may end up staffing with university grads or freshers, who are cheaper than seasoned Team A resources. In some cases, Team A resources may not even exist, as they may have been let go or reduced in numbers to focus solely on sales pitches.

‍

The consequence of this is the creation of a "Team B," which consists of less experienced and cheaper resources who are not equipped to handle complex client needs. As a result, clients may feel misled and unsatisfied with the services provided by the company.

‍

In the following sections, we will discuss the problems associated with having a Team B and explore possible solutions to avoid this situation.

‍

Problem Overview: Avoiding the Bait and Switch

Organizations may find themselves in a predicament when they are promised Team A resources during the sales pitch but end up with Team B resources during the actual engagement. This can lead to unsatisfied clients and negative reviews, which can damage the reputation of the company. In order to avoid the bait and switch, organizations must take proactive steps to ensure that they get the resources they were promised during the sales pitch.

‍

Here are five common problems that organizations face when trying to avoid the bait and switch:

  1. Limited availability of Team A resources: Consulting firms and BPOs may have a limited pool of seasoned resources due to a variety of factors such as turnover, competition, and cost. This can result in Team B resources being deployed for an engagement even though Team A resources were promised.
  2. Lack of transparency: Clients may not have access to the internal staffing process of consulting firms and BPOs. This lack of transparency can lead to uncertainty about the quality of the resources being deployed for an engagement.
  3. Budget constraints: Clients may have limited budgets, which can restrict the number of Team A resources that can be deployed. This can lead to a scenario where the firm deploys a mix of Team A and Team B resources for the engagement.
  4. Staffing mismatches: The requirements of the client may change during the course of the engagement, leading to a mismatch between the resources being deployed and the actual needs of the client.
  5. Lack of quality control: Consulting firms and BPOs may not have a robust quality control process in place to ensure that the resources being deployed meet the needs of the client.

‍

Solution Overview: Best Practices to Avoid the Bait and Switch

‍

To avoid the bait and switch scenario, organizations can take the following five steps:

  1. Negotiate for specific resources: During the sales pitch, organizations should negotiate for specific Team A resources that they would like to work with. This will ensure that they get the resources they were promised during the engagement.
  2. Define the scope of work: Organizations should clearly define the scope of work during the sales pitch to ensure that there is a clear understanding of the resources needed for the engagement. This will help the consulting firm or BPO to plan for the resources needed for the engagement.
  3. Request for resource profiles: Organizations should request for resource profiles of the resources that will be deployed for the engagement. This will provide transparency and help organizations to assess the quality of the resources being deployed.
  4. Conduct quality checks: Organizations should conduct regular quality checks during the engagement to ensure that the resources being deployed meet the needs of the client. This will help to identify and address any gaps in the resources being deployed.
  5. Set up a feedback mechanism: Organizations should set up a feedback mechanism to capture feedback from the client on the quality of the resources being deployed. This will help the consulting firm or BPO to improve the quality of the resources being deployed and avoid the bait and switch scenario.

‍

Conclusion:

In conclusion, avoiding the bait and switch scenario requires a proactive approach from organizations. By negotiating for specific resources, defining the scope of work, requesting for resource profiles, conducting quality checks, and setting up a feedback mechanism, organizations can ensure that they get the resources they were promised during the sales pitch. This will help to build trust with clients and improve the reputation of the company.