‍

Have you ever wondered why organizations choose to work with consulting firms instead of going directly to the service providers themselves? After all, hiring a consulting firm requires an extra layer of cost and coordination - so why not cut out the middleman?
If you've ever had to work with a consulting firm, you may have experienced the frustrations that come with managing a third party. From vague project plans to unexpected costs, it's easy to feel like you're not getting the value you paid for. But what if there was a way to bypass these challenges and work directly with the service providers themselves? In this article, we'll explore why organizations tend to choose consulting firms and whether it's always the best option.
By the end of this article, you'll have a better understanding of the pros and cons of working with consulting firms versus going directly to service providers. You'll learn about the benefits of cutting out the middleman, including potential cost savings, more direct communication, and a clearer understanding of who's responsible for what. You'll also gain a better grasp of when hiring a consulting firm might be the smarter move - and how to choose the right one for your organization.
Ready to explore how going directly to service providers can save you time, hassle, and money? Let's dive in and discover why more and more organizations are choosing to cut out the middleman and work directly with the companies that will do the work.

‍

When it comes to making strategic decisions for their organization, business leaders are often faced with a crucial choice: should they hire a consulting firm to guide them through the process, or should they go directly to the service providers themselves? There are pros and cons to both approaches, and both have been used by organizations around the world to achieve their desired outcomes.

On one hand, a consulting firm can provide valuable insights and expertise to help guide organizations through complex projects, such as mergers and acquisitions, digital transformations or even small projects like software implementations. Even further, consulting firms are often able to leverage their vast network of resources and connections to help organizations achieve results in a shorter timeframe.

However, there are drawbacks to hiring a consulting firm, including high fees and a lack of control over the final outcome. Additionally, some firms have a reputation for providing generic or unsatisfactory solutions, leaving clients to look for alternative solutions.

On the other hand, working directly with service providers can provide organizations with more control over the outcome, more direct communication with the individuals who will actually perform the work, and more transparency into the actual costs of a project. While cutting out the middleman may sound simple and obvious, it’s not always the best approach for every organization or project.

In this article, we'll explore why organizations tend to choose consulting firms and whether it's always the best option. We'll also take a closer look at the benefits of going directly to service providers, when this approach is a better choice, and how to make this approach work for your organization.

The Drawbacks of Hiring Consulting Firms for Your Organization

Many organizations turn to consulting firms for guidance on complex projects or to provide specialized expertise. While consulting firms have their advantages, they also come with significant drawbacks. These include high fees, opaque project plans, and a lack of control over the final outcome. Additionally, consulting firms sometimes offer generic or insufficient solutions, leaving clients to seek alternative options. Ultimately, organizations need to carefully consider their options before committing to a consulting firm for their project.

5 Detailed Problems with Hiring Consulting Firms

  1. High Cost: Consulting firms generally charge premium prices for their services, which can result in significant project cost overruns for organizations. For example, a consulting firm may charge $200 an hour for a project that could be done by an industry expert making only half that amount. This high cost could cause budget constraints for the organization that made it a risky investment in the long term.
  2. Lack of Understanding of the Organization: Consulting firms sometimes come with a lack of understanding of the organization and its goals. Even if they offer valuable insights and expertise, they may not be aligned with the organization's culture or objectives. This can result in solutions that don't fit well within the organization, resulting in a lower return on investment (ROI).
  3. Potential Conflicts of Interest: Consulting firms may have other clients with competing interests. This can lead to potential conflicts of interest and concerns over the impartiality of their work. For instance, a consulting firm that works with a competitor may have access to confidential information that could be used against the organization in question.
  4. Loss of Control: Organizations that choose to work with a consulting firm may lose control over important decisions concerning the project. The consulting firm may make decisions without consulting with the organization, leading to a potential disconnect between the desired outcome and the actual outcome.
  5. Generic Solutions: Consulting firms often use generic solutions that may not be tailored to the organization's specific needs. These are quicker to implement but may not address underlying problems. If custom solutions are not offered, firms may not produce significant results, leaving clients feeling unsatisfied with the engagement.

Best Practices for Working with Consulting Firms

While working with consulting firms can come with drawbacks, there are best practices that can help organizations mitigate these risks and make the most out of their engagement. These practices include developing clear project goals, asking the right questions upfront, and maintaining open communication throughout the engagement. By following these best practices, organizations can ensure they receive the best value from their investment.

5 Best Practices for Addressing the Problems with Hiring Consulting Firms

  1. High Cost: Organizations can mitigate the high cost of working with consulting firms by conducting thorough research and benchmarking prices in the market. Additionally, organizations should ask consulting firms for a detailed breakdown of costs, and agree on a clear pricing structure upfront with a cap. For example, an organization could negotiate a fixed fee with a consulting firm, based on expected time and materials.
  2. Lack of Understanding of the Organization: To address this challenge, organizations should conduct due diligence on potential consulting firms before engaging. They can look at the firm’s experience working with similar organizations and its track record of success. During the engagement, organizations should also provide the consultant with clear guidelines, objectives, and outcomes.
  3. Potential Conflicts of Interest: Organizations can mitigate the risk of potential conflicts of interest by conducting a conflict check prior to engaging the consulting firm. Additionally, they should request that their engagement with the consultant’s team is exclusive, so there is no risk of competitor conflicts of interest. Lastly, any concerns should be addressed directly with the consulting company or the consultant assigned to the project.
  4. Loss of Control: To address the risk of losing control, organizations should request and review a detailed project plan, and ensure it aligns with their objectives. Organizations should also select team members to lead the project and provide clear direction and oversight. By doing this, they retain the ability to control the decision-making process and have ultimate approval of project deliverables.
  5. Generic Solutions: To avoid receiving generic solutions, organizations should ensure the consulting firm provides custom solutions that fit their unique situation. Organizations should request references from the consulting firm to make sure they can successfully address their specific needs. Additionally, organizations should participate actively in the engagement and provide insights into their specific goals, as well as any concerns they have. By doing so, they can ensure the consulting firm tailors the solutions that fit their needs.

In conclusion, while hiring consulting firms can have benefits such as expertise, network resources, and guidance on complex projects, it's important to consider the potential drawbacks. To make the most of an engagement with a consulting firm, organizations should consider following best practices, such as establishing clear project goals, conducting due diligence, and maintaining open communication throughout the engagement. Additionally, organizations must work closely with consulting firms to ensure that solutions are tailored to their unique needs, reduce the risk of high costs, potential conflicts of interest and a loss of control over the project. Ultimately, the decision to work with a consulting firm or go directly to the service provider depends on the organization's specific needs and objectives. By carefully considering these factors, organizations can select the option that best fits their requirements and ensures successful project outcomes.

‍